Netflix movie《Who Stole the Trash Can》Plot highlights: Crazy hairdresser’s father seeks revenge for his daughter

《Who Stole the Trash Can》This well-produced TV series brings a very good viewing experience to everyone, and the various contents in it are also highly discussed. Among them is the Netflix movie《Who Stole the Trash Can》 Highlights of the plot: The crazy barber father's revenge for his daughter is very popular among everyone. Today I will watch the Netflix movie with you - Who Stole the Trash Can - Highlights of the plot: The father of the crazy barberRevenge for a woman.

《Who Stole the Trash Can》(Maharaja) is a new thriller Indian movie released on Netflix. The plot describes a barber who went to the police station to report that his trash can was stolen. The police at the police station were veryI was dumbfounded as to what kind of case this was, but the barber persisted. After filing the case and investigating, I discovered that what the barber was looking for was actually something more precious than a trash can!The whole movie will continue to make the audience curious about why the male protagonist is desperately trying to find the trash can, and combined with the issues of corruption, poverty, crime, and sexual crimes in Indian society, to be honest, this is a story with quite heavy issues.!

The director portrays a heartbroken father very fully. We will not see a heroic father, but we will see a stoic and persistent father. The plot uses the role of the male protagonist as a father as a fermentation of the atmosphere. The whole filmThe atmosphere of the film is full of suspense and mystery, and in the later stages it turns into thriller. In the story, the director never directly asks the male protagonist to express his inner thoughts directly. The male protagonist has a strong persistence, and the audience is attracted by the movie.You will find the contrast between the male protagonist in the first and second half!Quite exciting.

And - who stole the trash can - there is another very special thing - editing - the story arrangement is very special, but I am not sure whether every audience will accept it, because some people may think that the director's editing techniquesIt misleads the audience on the timeline and makes the audience confused. But for me, I think it’s okay. On the deliberately vague timeline, I can actually feel the male protagonist’s past story fermenting in the present.You can better understand and dissect the motivations behind any action the hero takes, full of colorful twists and turns!

From the trailer of "Who Stole the Trash Can", we can actually tell that the atmosphere of this movie is that of mystery and thriller. I think the director may have deliberately researched and adjusted the tone, becauseThe main color tone of the whole movie is - earthy yellow - yellow - grayish yellow -, it is like being covered with a layer of gray and there is no sense of cleanliness at all. Just like this society, behind the people's heartsThey all contain evil and filth, as well as the symbol - money - of irony that blinds people's hearts.

Why was the missing trash bin so important to Maharaja?Can an outsider understand why trash cans are so important?This actually requires Maharaja to deconstruct the relationship between him and his daughter and his uneasiness about her daughter leaving his side. From the very beginning, when Maharaja went to report that the trash can was stolen, the police's perspective was -Such a worthless thing - why bother to report it?Just like what we think, I can just buy one for you, why bother?This is actually the same as when a congressman's sunglasses were stolen at the beginning. He didn't want a new pair, but the original pair. This scene three-dimensionally illustrates Laxmi's importance to Maharaja andSeverity, because - value - is not measured by price, but is made up of emotion and meaning between people and things.Maharaja is a stubborn father. His love and persistence for his daughter are unsettling. There are two scenes in the movie that show Maharaja's determination for his daughter. One is asking the principal to apologize to his daughter, and the other isThe persistence of asking the police to find Laxmi. In both scenes, people decided to compromise because Maharaja was holding on to something, which brought out the persistence and determination of Maharaja.

Unless you agree to his request, you won’t let go!However, these scenes actually imply that in Maharaja's heart, his daughter is more important than anything else. When it comes to who stole the trash can, the plot finally deconstructs the fact that reporting the trash can is just a wish.Under the pretext of protecting his daughter's reputation, he wanted to use this case to attract the attention of the police and find the murderer, even at the cost of huge bribes to get the police interested.Maharaja's situation in the whole movie is quite pitiful. He is often beaten by these policemen in the police station. However, this is just a scene played by Maharaja in front of the police. I think the perspective of this movieAnd the editing is really wonderful. The first half of the paragraph will make the audience mistakenly think that Maharaja is waiting for the police to practice justice for him, but in fact he has long known that the police will have such a script, and the corruption of the police is the weakness of the attack., what he is looking for is not the trash can, but the murderer who harmed her daughter (and one of the murderers is in the police station, so the vague statement in the report is not only to protect his daughter, but also to prevent the police from letting anyone in.The accomplice discovers his purpose)!

《Who stole the trash can》Insinuating the darkness and corruption of the police《Only I can decide whether you can report the crime》Some people can't get justice here even if their lives are threatened《The male protagonist stays at the police stationThere are actually a lot of scenes and plots in it. Here there is a thief who specializes in stealing motorcycles, but he was beaten to death by the police. This design is used to irony that the police think that the thief who steals motorcycles should be beaten, but the person who steals the trash canThe contradictory theory that the thief should not be found, and even pointing a gun at Maharaja and refusing to report the crime, the director sarcastically points out that the value of things and the importance of the case lies in the power status that determines justice or not - who stealsOut of the Trash - The screenwriter and director directly showed the corruption of these police officers, and Maharaja paid bribes to actually let the police accept the case.You see, the money of 700,000 yuan basically ignited the police's fighting spirit to investigate the case, but the plot is not that simple, because the screenwriter made these police officers even worse. Not only did they want to get the 700,000 yuan, but they also secretly designedTo deceive Maharaja.The police also used forgery in handling this case. You will see that the police invented the murderer themselves to surrender and tried to deceive the male protagonist into closing the case. The irony is that some people will really sell themselves out for money.Free to be a scapegoat and make money.In a poor society, people will commit crimes that they would not even expect for money, and they may even feel justified in robbing others of their cherished things and hopes.

》Who stole the trash can? 《 Was the trash can inside really stolen?》Who stole the trash can--This movie is very strange. In fact, it doesn't matter to Maharaja whether the trash can was stolen or not, because what he is looking for is not the lost trash can, but the murderer who hurt his daughter., in fact, the trash can was not stolen at all, but was hidden by Maharaja so that he could report the crime. Through the director's editing and blending, the sequence of events was combined, allowing the audience to instantly understandIt is impossible to tell which one happened first and which happened last. There is such a design. I think the director wants to emphasize the truth and motives that outsiders cannot see, and emphasize the twists and turns behind the trash can theft case. The sequence of events should be like this:

15 years ago, Selwan was a habitual criminal who had been robbing people's money and killing people with his friends. One day, Maharaja accidentally discovered the identity of Selwan as a criminal in a barber shop and picked up Selwan.Wang wanted to give his daughter a gold necklace, and finally Maharaja notified the police and sent Selwang to jail. This caused him to lose his wife and child. This resentment made Selwang bear a grudge.When Maharaja was about to return the necklace to Selwan's wife, they died in a car accident, and one of the little girls was protected by a trash can and survived.Fifteen years later, Selwan wanted to take revenge on Maharaja, but that day because Maharaja came home late to buy shoes for his daughter, Jyoti was raped by Rana Siwang at home. In the end, Selwan alsoHe left without seeing Maharaja.Of course Maharaja, who loves his daughter deeply, will want to find the murderer to take revenge. Maharaja said it three times in total in the police station. I think the director laid it out very well, because I was thinking about it at the time.These seem to have been memorized. How come they are all the same word for word? Sure enough, it is really the content that Maharaja memorized in advance.The screenwriter didn't reveal the truth in Maharaja's statement until the end of the movie, because this was the process when Maharaja spoke from the perspective of his daughter.

Maharaja found Dana because he found a toll receipt left by the murderer at the scene and found the congressman's car. However, the congressman's car was actually sent for repairs and was stolen for a day. It was driven to commit the crime.That day, when Dana went to fight with the congressman, he let Maharaja know that one of the murderers was Dana. In addition to killing Dana, he also learned that one of the murderers was in the police station. This is why Maharaja wouldInsisting on reporting the crime and staying in the police station, even spending 700,000 to get the police to accept the case, so that Maharaja would have a reason to find out which policeman was one of the murderers at the police station (he was looking forWho has a lump on his quilt).

In fact, Maharaja did not directly find the accomplices and murderers in the police station (because he had no chance to find who had a lump on the back), but Narasiwan was willing to be a victim of crime and sent himself directly because of his greed for money.In the pit of fire, because it is very ironic that Narasiwang thought he could make a lot of money from the police inspector's tricks, but he did not expect that the trash can theft was actually a case committed by himself, and it was the retribution of a self-inflicted trap.The scene that he performed in front of Maharaja was the evidence that allowed Maharaja to truly discover that Narasiwan was also one of the murderers. After all, only those who have actually committed crimes here will know the details, right??

《Who stole the trash can》The screenwriter and director designed the murderers to be presented in a stacked manner. Because there are three murderers, the story structure is designed one after another, first Dana, then Selwang,Then there are the police hiding in the police station.The murderer of Dana is a relatively simple and arrogant thief. In the plot, we can know that Dana himself is a thief who often goes in and out of prison, so at first he was presented by the director as a relatively low-level person.The biggest devil in the trash can theft case is Selwan. He actually has his own family. The director is portraying that his motive for the robbery and murder is to give his daughter a good life in the future, and even buy her a priceless gift on her birthday.Fei’s gold and diamond necklace, his crimes and sins of harming people are stacked on his daughter (I think《who stole the trash can》in the ending, Maharaja also deliberately did not let Jyoti know that she is actually SelwanHis daughter, not only because of his love for his daughter, but also because Maharaja did not want his daughter to bear such a sin. After all, Jyoti told Serwan to his face that he was the most shameful person in the world), SerwanWang's selfishness and self-righteousness and fatherly love are really disgusting.

I think the screenwriter designed the villain's final fate and retribution very well. Although there are many coincidences in it, the ending - who stole the trash can - is really satisfying. There is no legal or illegal distinction between good and evil. After all,For a large part of the movie, it has been shown that there is little justice in the police station.Therefore, the fate of these three murderers was killed by the Maharaja instead of being handed over to the judiciary for sanctions. I think this is also a great irony of the screenwriter's judicial injustice. This case was based on the Maharaja's bribery.It took the police inspector to find the prisoner, and the police inspector allowed Maharaja to take revenge. This also deepened the irony that justice in Indian society needs to be bought with money.As for Selwang's retribution and punishment, it is nothing more than that his crime caused his biological daughter to suffer great pain. This is an amazing twist in the ending, because the trash can saves not Maharaja's daughter, butSelwang's daughter, so Selwang's revenge is borne by his daughter. No matter which father it is, this truth will collapse. This is of course the biggest punishment and regret for Selwang.

This is all about the Netflix movie - Who Stole the Trash Can - plot highlights: an analysis of the crazy barber’s father’s revenge for his daughter. I believe that after watching it, everyone will understand the plot of the TV series better, and the editor will continue to guide you in the future.Come to the relevant plot introduction information. If you like the content of this article, please pay attention to the line class.