《Judgment》 Episode 6 plot introduction

This TV series is undoubtedly a masterpiece with high viewing value, which immerses people in an imaginative and dramatic world.The production team and cast of "Judgment" have also attracted much attention. Their outstanding performance has added more luster to this TV series. Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about the plot introduction of episode 6 of "Judgment".Let’s chat together today.

Zheng Duo's lawyer made a request in court that Zheng Duo undergo a mental evaluation.However, this statement involved a threat to an appraisal officer at the Psychiatric Appraisal Center, requiring him to make a conclusion that was favorable to Zheng Duo.Such behavior is unethical and seriously violates the fairness and objectivity of professional spirit appraisal.However, despite such problems, the results of the psychiatric evaluation still came out.

According to the results of the psychiatric evaluation, Zheng Duo was determined to suffer from intermittent psychosis, which meant that he was in a state of illness when he committed the murder.In this case, the defender believes that Zheng Duo should not bear criminal responsibility.

However, we must realize that psychiatric evaluation is only a tool to determine whether there is a mental illness, and is not the only basis for determining whether a suspect should be reduced from criminal liability.The court also needs to consider other factors, such as whether Zheng Duo's mental state affected his ability to act, as well as his motive for killing and the nature of his behavior.

The court should conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the results of the mental evaluation and combine it with other evidence and relevant laws to determine whether Zheng Duo should bear criminal responsibility.If the court determines that Zheng Duo was indeed in a state of illness at the time of the murder, it may consider taking appropriate legal measures against him, such as psychiatric treatment or institutionalization.But that doesn't mean he's completely exempt from responsibility.

Finally, the court should investigate the behavior that threatens the forensic examiner in the statement and take corresponding disciplinary measures to ensure the fairness and professionalism of the psychiatric evaluation work.Such behavior is unacceptable and should be punished by law.

The collegial panel considered that the timing of the mental appraisal report was very suspicious, but Qi Heng pointed out that similar situations would occur in many criminal cases, and the collegial panel could not prejudge it. At this moment, a report letter was sent to the collegial panel, responsible for identifying Zheng Zheng.The seized appraiser revealed that he had been threatened.

The collegial panel decided to conduct a second mental appraisal. The evaluators of the second appraisal came to a conclusion completely opposite to that of the first, and concluded that Zheng Duo was not mentally ill.The collegial panel considered the two reports, the letter of complaint and the actual circumstances of the case and decided to accept the second report.Luo Huaigong failed to get people, so he became furious.

He asked Xiu Xiu to come up with ideas, and Xiu Xiu thought of using the power of the media to incite public opinion. They portrayed Zheng Duo on the Internet as a tragic hero who saved two survivors. The hero should not be sentenced to prison. This sparked a heated discussion on the Internet.The judges of the Intermediate People's Court are feeling great pressure.

The editor has specially carefully compiled the plot introduction of episode 6 of "Judgment", and provided a lot of information and useful information for friends who like this drama. If you are a "Judgment-"Loyal viewers, welcome to continue to follow our line lessons. More importantly, we will continue to update more relevant content, allowing you to explore and understand this excellent work more deeply.